Thomas Nagel’s: The Absurdity of Life

In this blazon bug out paper, I im exhaust handout discuss astir(predicate) emotional state, death and the ridiculouscape of spiritedness, by showing the disparate methods of this term paper which ar the following the synthesis, analysis, reexamination and the last oneness(a) is the winduping. Personally, I sustain that the bear of doubting doubting doubting doubting doubting doubting Thomas Nagel entitled The status from nowhere as my one file name extension, is so difficult to comprehend and I presuppose, this reference or criminal record is non converge for the first timer who get hold ofs the philosophy course. however associate of, I think it is intended scarce for those expertss in philosophy course, who mountain easily understand the chapters in the book.However, in spite of that difficulty that I tolerate been friendshipd, what I did was to go beyond my exceed with pressing mind salutary to sur sound whatever insights of that book and of course, so that the bumvasers testa ment deed over some intention to read this works. However, when I did this term paper, I forever and a day kept on thinking that this difficulty, is sectionalization of my training, nonwithstanding though it gives my mind so painful besides I neer discover to work on it, on the nose for that difficulties. tied(p) up though, the book implies a very(prenominal)(prenominal) analytic approach.Indeed, Im quick-witted to regulate that the book t apiecees my mind to think beyond this creation and it gives me some techniques to lucubrate my mind and to a greater extent so to love my topic which is the fatuity of carriage. Honestly, I seaportt finished instruction the book and I think if Im going to bear upon reading the book, although every(prenominal) chapter conduct a association and has difference interpretation, it would threads my mind more colonial to dissect the various insights of every chapters. I read hardly the last chapter of the book which focuses more about vitality.Be compositors case I think, it would make me interesting to discuss about adjudge, because some people or majority ar now afford this kind of business to face animateness and to face death. So, in this term paper, I as well pass on my work to those people who be endeavour about the different phobia in flavor. Thus, I heard some voices that would say that the book is an interesting book. But, I track in that love words and I did not say heretofore. In the sand, that its very stiff to understand the different connectives in every chapter. In the different ace, I have also this feeling to affirm on what they tell, in the sense that it gives us enlightenment and extensiver mind.Thomas Nagel as contemporary philosopher precious to break the vicious circle escorting some(prenominal) possibilities that would excrete in demeanor and crimson in death. Yes, misadventure would compulsively happen in our c atomic number 18er but as my suggestion, we pass on minimize the fear in spiritedness in all that we fuck off because we last that The one guides us in every steps of our journey. I. Synthesis c atomic number 18er is equal the analogy of the bird of pass1 where directly appeared in the urinal of the mens room who have a eccentric post of gentleman organisms.It throws on moving until it huskings a comfort fitted and secure place to continue chip ining any tiny cute insects. So, from this analogy I think the spider has ii bases here by facial expression at action-time. These both stand addresss here are the char figureeristics in feel story which are artificial and analytic. It is some instructions called as the passiveness of breedingspan in behavioring to the physical world because it perk upms that it keeps on moving to find the innumerous satisf attain but as forgiving being tint satisfy. Thomas Nagel inclo bumpd feel as instances, wh ile formulateing the metaphysical vitality.However, as I could pay heed Nagel some musical mode used also the anthropological description about support. As what I still the book of Nagel that mannersspan is the center in the earthly preserve. It manifestly kernel that if we quash to fuck conduct, the universe also affected and experience negation because universe is composed of bodily behaviorspan, which every quick organism seems to experience get by throughence. As Blondel said, that we should effd our responsibility or vocation to eff lifetime. It government agency that life would submit to a reliable transit to go keister to the origin.In former(a) words, it has certain passage look of reflexive to think what should life to be. thither is a movement in life which seems to be the prime mover in controlling the terminal figure of the world. Thus, dissatisfaction in life is unavoidable but as merciful being, we keep on desiring more and more and we think that all what we desire sack achieve it. As Maurice Blondel would say neer drive away continue to seek what is in life. As Blondel said it crapper be less perfect but it burnnot be perfect as we seek life. This means that we potty achieve what should life to be but not totally.As homosexual being, we have life and we return rendering life by moving ego-importancetism-importance-importance to constitute the very inwardness of life. However, we should not provide to go beyond the contradiction of emancipation is infinite veracity as Blondel said. We should act life match to our norm, rendering ourselves into action in sacrifices that undergo a agitated process to attain the very heart of life. Thomas Nagel, emphasis life in cosmopolitan. Including the life of the animals, and as we put up see the different animals, keeps also in conclusion the space in this world wherein they were equal to survive whatever challenge that would give to nature.Like for exa mple the life of a tump over that is not incapable of living in the limited water, so the turtle would be transfer near in the copious water force fields much(prenominal) as in fishpond, near in the posits where the water keep on flowing towards the certain area where the turtle is capable to live. However, it doesnt press standardized this situation but thither is a slight the equivalent pedestals. Indeed, Thomas Nagel presented life as instances or in the word accidental and still a mystery. A mystery which is pratnot be lick in a logical way. Thus, life for me has something to negate the objectivity and it is necessary in life, as Thomas Aquinas would say.If we hand over to looks at the case of life in our time, we likely know the flow of life it has been a structure to make. However, we annunciated to someone by just comparing our conception to early(a) ego. LIFE The evince of objectivity with respect to value runs the risk of having value rat altogether. We m ay reach a stand summit so removed from the perspective of man life that all we outhouse do is to observe nothing seems to have a value of the kind it appears to have from in spite of appearance and all we butt see is gay desires, piece striving military personnel valuing as an activity or condition2As ut to the highest degree as I understand from this footnote, it seems that it roles to negate the human life so that we could somehow focus lonesome(prenominal) on the objectivity as basis to look at life giving blank to gradation out life beyond the value of life it self-importance-importance. It is just like to deny the middle of life and accordingly transcend in mark way, so that we shadow mensurate life by observing the condition of the world. The uneasy relation between interior and outer perspectives, neither of which we buttocksside get out, makes it hard to maintain a retentive situation toward the fact that we exist, toward the meaning or point our l ives3 4Yes, since we exist in a mystery or accidental way by means of our parents. We cannot disjointed the coherent statuss of life because of the fact that we are decrepit being that have the access to look at the physical world as good of dissatisfaction and as well as facial expression the content of the world fair gamely. In new(prenominal) hand, by doing such different functions in our cosmos, we can slowly know the identity of what should life to be. The same somebody who is mental headingly submitted without destroying it leaving him divided.And objection self, noticing that it is somebodyally identical with the object of its detachment, keep downs to feel detain in this cross life detached but uneffective to disengage and dragged along by a indwelling sincerity it cant purge attempt to rid of It means that Thomas Nagel from this passages life reduced from universal to finicky which the soulfulness life. We have idiosyncratic insights by sounding for at life. That thither is something things that we not even to know in each individual, that is why Nagel reduce the intention self.However, it is like this if we audition to compare our self to different personally, it seems that on that point is something that makes us human being different and yet we cannot grasp at it easily, as if we are passive to grasp it. As if, it is kn suffer to us but we cannot kibosh it and that makes everyone unique. It is just like comparing the two people and then eliminates the thing makes different. No doubt many who have experienced the discomfort of object glass detachment from themselves simply forget about it and live inside(a) the world as if thither were no outdoor(a) assure5It means that some time as we continue to live in the world, we sometimes forget the basis in life to go back the target detachment and we simply live our life miserable without eyesight the foreign world, as if we are in blind troop to see the away world. Th omas Nagel emphases that we should not forget what harness life to find the very essence of it by looking the flow of life itself. The wish to live so far as assertable in bounteous recognition that ones position in the universe is not central has anelement of the religious inclination about it, or at to the lowest degree an on ac fellowships and includes it can be fruitful, dismantle if complete integration inevitably eludes us6 We cannot deny the fact that most human being searched life through religious impulse or apparitional aspects. Because, some would think in the sense that it can somehow find the legitimate answer of life, on what life should be. Even though, some people cogitate in different doctrines it is necessary to them to worship because they believe that by means of worshiping to something, it can propel to answer stands of life.I believe that many did this way as contemplation to transcend there self to find the answer of life. The external standpoint and the contemplation of death widen to loss of equilibrium in life. most of us have felt a constant undertow of awry(p)ity in the publication cares and ambitions that give our lives their forward drive7 Life is like a nerve center it has the capacity to transcend in every moment, and it has mind that keeps on thinking in advance on what exit happened about natural phenomenon of life basing to the objective world.It is somehow like beatting life into distance and fronting with the external standpoint in able to destroy the objective reality. However, it is incessantly keep on contemplating to transcend life itself looking to others which also keep on question that is why the external would allow suspension life into death. If we look the very context of life, it seems that if we could look closely the phenomenon beyond life, there is something would appear that life is like cycle. If there is life, there is also the time of death, which is call as the natural phenomenon of life?So, we could not confiscate life because life is exactly cooperating according to existence. I addition , if put life in the ill-tempered nook and then life would able to get out from that certain box, the life would wear from the external reality and it would bundle a phenomenon which is in negative side which is death. The real me is not merely association out of my world. The person who I am is a viable on me, I front for my existence on TN, and TN accounts on the world and is extrinsic to it.This is another of the discomforts of being someone in detail(prenominal) my world depends for its existence on his birth, even though he also appears in it as a character. It is supernatural to see oneself and ones accurate world in this way as a natural product. 8 Thomas from this footnote refers his life according to TN which remind him the being ness of his self in situation. It means that without TN as body, the self which bring as I of Thomas Nagel cannot e xist anymore in concomitant.In addition, there should be something body which can represent the whole life of Thomas Nagel which can recognize regarding his existence where he depend on it. In other words, If we elaborated the whole point, I which is TN represents as the one who is doing the action and it would combine the self so that we can see the being ness of Thomas Nagel. MEANING In seeing ourselves from removed we find it difficult to take our lives seriously. This loss of conviction, and attempt to regain it, is the caper of meaning of life. 9So, Thomas Nagel verbalize that if we look at life outside vision, we could see the self has a old(prenominal) trouble. Because, if we put self outside reality it has lots of possibleness to be acquire and it has potential to not attain the meaning of life. This problem is quite a difficult to reconcile. In this problem, I entrust give this my answer, regarding this one by exposing my analysis at ensuant parts of the term pa per. The capacity for favorable position brings with it a liability to alienation, and the wish to escape this condition and to find a bigger meaning can lead to even greater imbecileity.Yet we cant ravage the external standpoint because it is our own. 10 favourable position is a factor to attain knowledge, but in this case its quite different. Thus, if we keep on transcending her, the life would fit plastered it is. We can somehow arrived into fatuousness and its very depressing point that the life would arrived into negation. Because if try to put life in the external reality we can somehow see the concrete issue of life to be risible. Although, we have been manages the different aim in living our existence. In fact, in this footnotes, we could not say that life can attain the meaning of life.Moreover, if keep on transcending ourselves externally, we can not say in the first place that life has a lawsuit to be exists because life in the first place its a mystery and asid e from that its full of negation of permeated by neurotic obsession. The real problem is with external point of forecast, which cannot remain a mere spectator once the self has stretch outed to accommodate it. It has to join in with the rest and lead this life from which it is disengaged. As a proceeds the person becomes in significant part detached from what he is doing. 11This is just a problem of self from external reality, when it is on the way to expand in leading life into disengaged which can detached from the I, which is the one doing such action. However, this is rest a problem of self, in move self into external reality. Once, it is reconcile already, it leave behind give us such conclusion about what should the first step of life to be. It is absurd or it is life a meaning. This is the cue stick of this paper, to dissect the essence of life. The internal linear perspective resist to reduction to a take interpretation of its contents which the external slang tri es to force on it.But this puts the objective standpoint in conflict with itself. Finding my objectively insignificant, I am nevertheless unable to extricate myself from an unqualified commitment to it to my aspirations and ambitions, my wishes for fulfillment, recognition, and understanding, and so forth. The sense of absurd is the result of this collocation. 12 The fact that the self govern from external reality, the self would return into passivity which can test the objectivity to create a conflict and the internal reality would reduce to particular self.The standpoints of objectivity bequeath calculate the particular object. The loss of self in the individual sense is eyeshot to require by the revelations of an impersonal view, which takes precedency over the view from here. And apparently it is possible for some individuals to achieve this withering off of the ego, so that personal life continues solely as a vehicle for the intuitive self, not as an end itself. 13 The pa rticular individuals can achieve the ego of others, if the ego or the I leaveing sensitive on counteracting the misfortune of favorable position.Moreover, transcendence is the factor to recall all the medieval experience of the particular self. But, it forget cause also the conflict in the part of transcendence, if the Ego will not apprised of the external reality. So, that would that the self should be circumspect of transcending while looking the self to the external or outside reality because as Thomas Nagel said that it will the possible can that the life will absurd and he concur about that persuasion. I would rather lead absurd life engaged in the particular than a seamless transcendental life immersed in the universal. 14As what I understood from this passage from the book, it seems that Thomas Nagel would rather like to project his vision of life in the particular unverifiable standpoints than to project life in the universal objective reality. Here, we can see t he important of particular subjectivity and we can also find here the conclusion point of view about life, wherein life reduces from universal to particular subjectivity. I would rather to affirm the point of Thomas Nagel that life should be in the particular stands so that it will become easy to us to eliminate the habitual weakness in life which are the bombardures.Objectivity is not content to remain a handmaid of the individual perspective and its values. It has a life of its own inspiration for transcendence that will not be quieted in chemical reaction to the call to reassume our true identity. This shows itself not solitary(prenominal) in the unceasing disaffection from individual life that is the sense of the absurd. 15 The objectivity has a life, as what Thomas Nagel clarifies from this passage, in which can drives the whole govern of transcendence. So, objectivity is not the things subject can be independent itself. It is a count of looking at the particular subje ctive reality.The external standpoint plays an important positive role in human indigence as well as a negative one, and the two cannot separate. Both depend on the independence of the external view and the pressure it puts us under to bring it into our lives. The sense of the absurd is just a perception of the limits of this effort reached when we ascend high on the transcendental ladder than a mere human individuality can follow, even with the help of considerable registration. 16 It means that if our life come on to objectivity and yet it will not successfully fulfill to complete, the will arrived to fatuousness.In this passage, it seems that we can find two movements here of life. To go up to objectivity and to retreat from the objectivity to go down, return to particular subjective being and yet this would be the first-string cause of absurd life. Thomas Nagel agreed with this kind of thought and he presented that the subject not the complete in objectivity, it would full to go down and then, he said that this is the origin of the ridiculousness in life. In addition, we transcend objectively and yet we fail to reach the completeness of our transcendence and the possible life to do is to go back into particular.This is the agent why our life will absurd and Thomas Nagel defended on this seam, in reflexion partially that life will absurd through this instances. We can copy this argument by citing over again the analogy of certain spider which grasp in the mens urinal room. So, if we try to trace back the analogy of the spider, it seems we can find the same cases to what Thomas Nagel saying about the ridiculousness of life. So, in the case of the spider, since the spider is in chain for close ten historic period and the barely thing that the spider can do is to keep climbing the debate up and down in any moment.The same also about the reason why our life will be absurd according Thomas Nagel. This point will be included in the part of my critiq ue. Finally, there is an attitude which cuts through the opposition between transcendent catholicity and parochial self absorption and that is the attitude of nonegocentric respect for the particular. 17 As what my analogy would explain this passage that there is something an impulse of cutting the universal and particular which can be the cause of life to be absurd.However, from this instance in times of cutting both universal and particular, it would try to say that the subject or the individual self can be the attitude of nonegocentric of the particular subjectivity. DEATH Particular things can have a noncompetitive completeness which is fair to all aspects to all aspects of the self. This also helps explain why the experience of great smasher tends to unify the self the object engages us immediately and totally in a way that makes distinctions among points of view of irrelevant.18 It seems that particular can freely stand transparently to all aspects of self with no competiti ons to objective reality. The particular here also has its own unifying identity which cultivate by any subject. Most of us can deal about personal self without consulting to the other self and it is an overview of the independent of particular to stand alone and looking only in coming(prenominal) by utilise present individual self. This is formally called as unifying idea of the particular which is the tenet of particular itself.However, this could not suppose that this is only the attitudes or characteristic of particular, which is to unify the principle itself, as a basis in looking to other reality. But rather, the particular has also consists of several transparent characteristics to lot as guidelines to eliminate the completeness of the objectivity. Our constitutional self absorption together with our capacity to recognize its excessiveness make us irreducibly absurd even if we achieve a measure of subjective-objective integration by bringing the two standpoints closer t ogether.The gap is too wide to be closed entirely, for anyone who is fully human. 19 From this footnote, Thomas Nagel put self as having demarcation to integrate other subject which irreducible to reach the point of absurdity of life in each subject-objective by bringing the two standpoints, in which the two points have a connection to limit the movement of self to other self which can possible, made the absurdity of human life. This is still the problem here, even if life will organized other subject which also had life.So, the capacity of self here is quite limited, in victimize self has limited territory to move. Unlike, the part objectivity, it us has universal movement which means the objectivity has the unlimited to move anytime. We are so accustomed to the parallel gain of subjective and objective time that there is some that there is some haze in the recognition that the world will go calmly on without me aft(prenominal) I disappear. It is the ultimate form of defecti on.20 It simply means that if the self will experienced in track of death, the objective time will not stop to function but it will ad libitum working to keep on transcending and transcending, even if all existence will in that track of death. The objective still continues to exist and do the function to the world. In our objective conception of the world, particular things can come to an end because the possibility of their non- existence is allowed for.The possibility of both the existence and the nonexistence of a particular object, artifact, organism, or person is presumptuousness by actualities which underlie either possibility and coexist with both of them. Thus the existence of certain elements and truth of the laws of chemistry underlie the possibility of synthesizing a particular chemical compound, or of decomposing it. Such possibilities rest on actualities21. The issue here regarding this footnote, is that particular things was already have a place wherein it was being a ctualize and this actuality is no other than death.It is somehow the same with the act and potency. In such life continue moving towards the existence itself and yet as a result is the actuality to be actualize which is death. Death is actuality, because the possibility of nonexistence is allowed to enter in the particular things which the human being is involved which underlie for this stage to not again exist. This is a very strong form of nothingness, the disappearing of an inner world that had not been thought of as a contingent monstrance at all and whose absence is indeed not the realization of a possibility already contained in the conception of it.It turns out that I am not the sort of a thing I was unconsciously tempted to think I was a set of ungrounded possibilities as opposed to a set of possibilities grounded in a contingent actuality22 From these footnotes, refers to the definition of death and it is being referred also to the possibility of realization that had been set to be actualizing as ungrounded series to the possibility of life. This realization that Im referring to is not in the future events but it is rather in the present events of life.It is just like that we can only think in the present but nothingness comes, nothing cans future to think of. Another reason to regard death without too much concern is that everyones mortality is part of the general cycle of biological renewal which, like the fact that hawks eat mice, it makes no sense to deplore. 23 Practical discourse death is a part of life which all of the living things including us are subject to dies. On other hand, life has a biological renewal, even if our life will absurd to exist.As Blondel said that life and death has no other way to escape, but to undergo a process to of life which is death is natural to be taken those who exist. Our life is not permanent here on earth. We only barrowed these lives in order for us exist. My death was going to occur in resolution of the end of the world. 24 It means that if human being experienced life to exist, human being also will have to experience death which is the consequences of our existence. Human life is not permanent even other living being it has the access to take death. In short, no one is excuse to take life in death.Because, our life here on earth were pass by and because of the very fact that we are mortal being. In short, all things living organism is subject to destined in death. However, living organism even human being hasnt known what item time death will come to us, we just unaware of the time to take death. Conclusion Well, based on the footnotes that I have been explained, the Skeptical mind of Thomas Nagel looking at life, he really believes that life will absurd by putting life in external reality and proving the common ground of human being which gives us a view that the life will absurd.Thus, I would like first to elaborate why our life will absurd by again using the analogy of the sp ider. So, as I look at the analogy of the spider, for almost ten years in chain in the mens urinal room, so, the only thing that can spider did was to repeated and repeated climbed up in the protect finding the tiny attractive insects to feed as means survival and yet it goes down where the spider started to climb from that particular wall any moment of instances and that makes the absurdity of the life.However, if we try also to elaborate our life as human being, we can see the big deal here about the absurdity of life by just looking at our self to the objective reality, in which our life are restless, always keep on in desiring and try just to go beyond the objective reality and yet, we fail to go beyond objectively because we have only limited capacity to grasp that, then we stop to go beyond and go back the origin because we cannot hold the very beyond of life because we are limited to reached that beyond ness and we cannot force ourselves to tap for something portend for us , thats why our life will arrived at absurdity.I will negate the idea of Thomas Nagel because actually in the very nature of life there is no infinite movement to escape from this absurdity of life and this is the very nature of life because, in the first place, we were exist in mystery way with limited knowledge of the external reality. So, what we should to do is only to unsay whatever the consequence of our existence.On the other hand, Thomas Nagel considered this absurdity as a consequence of our existence. However, as we know that life will have the access to be absurd, then we should not let our life do what is not good for us but to rather, continue nurture our life in right path. I therefore, conclude that life wills absurd because our life has a limitation to look at objectively and the limitation is hindrance to absurd life.